One Voice In America Blog
Home
The Death of Johannesburg
About Blogging Here
About The Author
An Open Letter to the American People
An Open Letter to Congress
An Open Letter to Barack Obama
Contact Me

Welcome to the One Voice In America blog!

This is only one voice in America, among many voices.  The hope here is that it will be one voice that speaks differently, and will be a voice you will find worth listening to.  A lot is happening in America these days, and you will find a lot to read here about it. 
 

You may find some of the opinions rendered by the author of this blog rather different, maybe controversial. However, I can assure you the words written here are ladened, impassioned feelings, but they are not emotional, rash words written hastily. They are written to present a different viewpoint that hopefully will challenge your thinking. It is not meant to offend, but as an American citizen of the United States of America, the author exercises his right to free speech. At a time when it is more popular to be politically correct, the words you find here are direct and look to make a point. To get any statement’s full meaning, it will be important to read the entire passage to see it in its full context and understand its meaning.

If you like what is said here, please spread the word about it to your friends, or feel free to create links to it on your own web page.

 
 

Sunday, July 17, 2011

A Major Plot AFoot Of Obama With the Debt Crisis

I could see a *major* plot afoot taking place with this whole debt crisis, but this is not *just* about the debt crisis. I see three legs to it, all needing to happen pretty much simultaneously to ensure Barack Obama‘s continued quest to stay in power.

Read on to find out about the three different legs, and why I feel we should be more concerned about what is taking place in Washington right now:

8:08 am mdt

1) Raising the debt ceiling

1) The debt crisis itself. As far as solutions go, America could handle it quite easily. The crisis is only what Obama makes of it. What he makes of it is dependent on how it goes for him. If he gets his way, he will fix things--his way. But it will not bode well for America, in the long run.

What I see him doing is with his holding the economy down even longer is take advantage of money big corporations are racking in right now. Corporations are hanging on to their money, instead of using it to hire new workers and invest in new equipment. That makes for even more money that Obama can plunder and spend.

Additionally, I think that Obama is also forcing economic change in this country by forcing companies to move out of New York and relocate elsewhere. He wants “drain the economic swamp” that he sees New York having become, and he has political supporters in power there to help him with whatever vision he has for the place.

With the recent re-emergence of the Ground Zero mosque, I have to suppose that changes in New York will be tied to Moslems and making it the world power base with the United Nations centered there.

Obama does not necessarily seem to be anti-business to me. He does not at all mind hanging around people with money, and spending money. He does not complain about China’s economic push, or having any problem with the wealth of middle east shieks. Does he talk down to the building in the United Arab Emirates? Not at all.

With his constant referral to “shovel-ready” jobs, it would seem Obama is trying to get Americans to accept the idea of accepting those kinds of jobs instead of the good jobs Americans used to have that made this country so great.

I listen to the liberal news media--people like “thrill up my leg” Chris Matthews--and while they are all so enthralled with Barack Obama because of the change he strives to bring about, I find them all turning a blind eye to the exact kind of change he wants to bring. And because they do not bother to ask this man the pertinent questions that they should in what his intents are, rather than trusting him emphatically, I do believe they, and others who support him, will eventually wake up to a world they do not care to have, and will miss the one they did. By then, however, it will all be too late.

If this country, as I have heard for years now, is to be divided into seven separate nations, then forcing this kind of economic re-location makes some sense. It also divides the economic power that New York held in the world so things can be more spread out and even, as they would want things to be among nations.

8:06 am mdt

2) The end of Fox News?

2) Fox News. The news stories about Rupert Murdoch’s phone hacking of people’s voice mail. The scandal has its roots more in Britain, but 9/11 victims have been made victims of him, as well. However, my sense is the story itself is based on a scandal, and is meant to bring down Fox News, which he owns.

Make no mistake about it--Obama means to bring Fox News down. It has been a thorn in his side since the beginning. As it is, I have already seen the changes that have been taking place there. Fox News is not becoming more “fair and balanced”--Obama is taking advantage of it by having people like Alan Combs, Juan Williams, and Bob Beckel there. I tend to believe the whole NPR thing was a scheme to get Juan in there, because Fox liked him so much. But since his coming to Fox, Juan has changed and become more vocal about his views, challenging others there more fiercely.

The end result is that things are becoming a shouting match there. That will only turn off viewers. O’Reilly has said that he cuts people off the way he does because his guests start saying something stupid. Well, Bill, let them say it! Let them get their views out there in a forum that allows them to do so. Then come back, and tear their arguments to pieces if they are incorrect!

But, just as with the Ground Zero mosque (which is also now coming back into the news again, interestingly enough), and the Gulf oil spill, Obama separates himself from things he does not want to be seen as a part of. And that is just what he is doing to Fox now--while the destruction of Fox takes place over in Great Britain, out of the mainstream news.

And Fox has not been covering the story themselves much--but I think they should. Unless, of course, they are being told not to some how. They should be defending themselves. Here is my feeling about it:

A large part of the commotion over in Britain revolves around the voicemail hacking of a murdered schoolgirl, a Milly Dowler, as well as victims of the 7/7 London bombings, and up to 7,000 other Brits. So far, however, I have not seen any specific information on the nature of the hackings and why it was done. The outcry may be huge in Britain, but a person is innocent until proven guilty, and we need to find out what exactly took place and why.

There may be much larger part of the story, with the FBI here getting involved on (only the possibility) of misconduct done here. What I find very suspicious is that there is a report of only one single New York police officer/investigator being contacted concerning phone records of 9/11 victims.

It may be a police officer that has been contacted, but police officers are not above being corrupted, and with Eric Holder initiating this investigation, I get more the feeling that it is a setup to help bring down Fox News here in America. And to keep people from seeing the setup, these kinds of things have to be done in such a way that people do easily see the relationship between the different pieces. What I offer here in the following is not what I feel is the accurate picture, but merely a good possibility of something that should be investigated, as well.

Earlier in the year, when Obama went to lay a wreath at Ground Zero after the death of bin Laden, he held a closed-door meeting with only a carefully selected group of 9/11 victims. The email sent to them from the White House was only addressed “'Dear 9-11 family member”. The White House said they “personally invited a group of 9/11 family members who we believe represents a cross section of family members from various 9/11 organizations”, but the invitation contained no names. No one can know who exactly was invited.

I would hardly be one to say anything bad about the 9/11 survivors, but any time Barack Obama holds a closed-door session of any sort, it leads me to wonder just why, and why, in such a ceremony, all 9/11 survivors were not invited, if they could make it. It would be much simpler. In an email to the journalist who wrote the article, the White House responded that “If that personal touch did not come across, it was only as a result of technological and time constrictions in pulling together such an important discussion on such short notice.”

Technological constrictions? What does that mean. And when the President is coming to meet with them, why should the White House state that it involves“…such an important discussion”. Why a “discussion”? What about? And why behind closed doors? Maybe I am making a mountain out of a molehill here, but it sounds rather suspect here.

Were the selected people all ones that the White House somehow knew back then News of the World had succeeded in tapping into their voicemails? Or maybe it is because all these people were Obama supporters, as Obama has done in many of his town hall meetings).

I have no idea what could have taken place that day, but my bloodhound sense about that meeting says there *may* be some connection here that the public is not being made aware of.

The public reaction to Rupert Murdoch is growing, both here and abroad, with very little of the actual facts behind the story having come out. To me, it appears this story is

being almost intentionally enflamed in the media, and I think it may well be to help bring not only Rupert down, but Fox and the Wall St. Journal as a result of it.

Knowing the antagonism the White House has had toward Fox, which it is just now attempting to smooth over, one has to wonder if it is, as I have said, Obama’s way of distancing himself from this story…

http://www.wpix.com/news/wpix-family-unhappy-about-obama-visit,0,3130114.story

I furthermore have a feeling that just as Obama distanced himself from the BP oil spill, and the Ground Zero mosque that Obama may be doing the same thing here. Having the scandal begin in the United Kingdom certainly puts some distance between Obama and Murdoch. But in checking this story out, I see a lot of Labor party members coming out about the scandal in Britain, and Democrats coming out against Murdoch here.

Specifically, California Democrat Anna Eshoo, a member of a House of Representatives committee that examines privacy issues, said that it should investigate News Corp. Representative Bruce Braley, an Iowa Democrat, called for an investigation by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee into whether News Corp broke US anti-corruption laws by bribing British police officers.

Furthermore, the second biggest shareholder in News Corp. is a Saudi billionaire, and his holding company and controls 7 percent of the votes. At this point, while I know nothing about this Saudi billionaire, with how America is being attacked on all sides these days, I have to be a little suspicious of this man.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/press/no-escape-as-murdoch-faces-date-with-phonehacking-victims-2314079.html

If Barack is successful in getting rid of Fox News, there will be no alternative news service, especially for the 2012 elections.

8:05 am mdt

3) A possible death of Congress?

3) Lastly, the death of Congress itself. If Obama gets his way with this debt crisis, he will blame the Republicans, turn people against them, and turn the tide of the election to himself. If he wins, the Republicans could be tossed out, Democrats will stand aside for Obama, and Congress, as we know it, will be done away with. Sound too implausible? Maybe so, but if we care about America, we must learn to look at the worse case scenarios so we can guard against such things from happening when our way of life is being threatened.

Much has been said about Obama, that he does not know what he is doing, that he is a narcissist, and just ruining our nation. After all, he is just a “community organizer”. But I think he is, as I have heard some refer to him, a visionary. The question is, what kind of visionary is he, and what exactly is his vision?

Well, if his vision was a good one, he would not be as controversial as he is. He would actually lead this nation and take it to a better place. But everything he does is forced, and done with deceit and behind closed-door meetings. Those kinds of things should tell us that he cannot be up to anything good--for America, as we enjoy it now, at least. We must get a fighting spirit back in this country to keep him from getting his way, and with this debt crisis, my feeling is that it may well be our last chance to stop him, and the 2012 elections will hang in the balance.

If he gets his way, in his vision, I can imagine that he will see himself bringing a lot of other changes that he may have in his “vision”. But what those are, exactly, is probably anyone’s guess. But before he can restore the kind of order that he things Washington needs to have, he has to remove the power base that is already there, and this would be the way to do it.

Does this seem too implausible? I do not think so. Obama has gained strength with each and every political victory he has made. And he is looking to get his way in this huge battle over the debt crisis, as well. It is not about serving the American people. This administration is about “fundamentally changing” the United States, and we should know through all his strong-arm tactics and lies that he means to do it any way he can.

We have seen how he plays to the Republicans and the American people. We can only hope that Boehner, Cantor and McConnell have seen his lies and deceit, know how much is at stake here, and have enough courage and fortitude to keep from caving in to Obama’s tricks.

8:04 am mdt

An additional 4th part

4) An additional, but rather separate part to this will be Obamacare. With Obama succeeding in accomplishing the above tasks, he will also ensure that Obamacare will never be repealed. He will have the power to prevent it from happening. I always felt that Obama’s strategy with keeping it from going right to the Supreme Court was that he was hoping to have to replace another retiring SC judge.

But he might have been seeing this thing with the debt crisis being all he needed to keep it from going to the Supreme Court because if could preserve it that long, the Supreme Court would be a moot issue for him.

8:03 am mdt

August 2nd--what really may be behind the date

The August 2nd deadline in this debt crisis is purely manufactured, and it has nothing to do with Social Security checks being mailed out on August 3rd. The only reason for the big deadline is the August 3rd is also Barack Obama’s 50th birthday. And he is returning to Chicago that day for a supposedly a big campaign fund-raiser.

Well, if he gets his way, it will be a huge fund-raiser for him, because if he accomplishes the three above goals, there will be nothing to keep him from winning the 2012 election. If that happens, however, the fund-raiser will really become a giant celebration event--given in his honor, on his 50th birthday--to his having decimated the United States, single-handledly. And what a party that will be for him!

That’s why attendees will be able to go to that event for a minimum of only $50. He wants as many people there as possible! And for a narcissist like Obama with such an inflated ego of himself as he has, he will want to ensure it is a huge success…and the way to do it is to ensure he deals a final death blow that will send his enemies reeling so they will not be able to recover from--all done in time for his 50th birthday!!

And that is why Obama is reacting to the Republicans the way he is--because they are not budging on this debt issue! There is so much riding on it for him, and he DOES NOT want his big 50th birthday bash bashed…especially by just a few hard-nosed Republicans that he cannot budge in Washington!!

America is hanging by a thread right now! Obama does not want the economy to tank because it is not in his best interest not to. It is in his best interest to get the limit raised and be allowed to spend more! But if he cannot blame it on the Republicans, as he wants, he will destroy the whole thing!

8:02 am mdt

Last chance for Republicans

 

I say Republicans MUST tow the line and be completely un-wielding to Obama.  Whatever happens to the economy has to just happen, no matter how bad it gets, because if Obama gets his way in this “crisis”, things will be FAR worse later on for America. America will be gone, and there will be no getting it back.

There is no getting around it. We have allowed Obama to get his way each and every time. And each time he does, he gets stronger and stronger. Then he puts on a nicer face for the American people. But all the while, this man is lying through his teeth to get what he wants over and over and over again! We cannot allow it to happen this time. It is just far too critical! And Republicans have what may well be the last best chance to stop Obama and do major damage to his political machine.

Obama messed up, telling Eric Cantor “not to call his bluff”. It was not a simple mistake of not meaning to say “I’m not bluffing” instead. Obama is bluffing--big time, especially as far as there not being any money in the coffers to pay social security and veterans. There is PLENTY of money there in Washington! It is just a matter of where Obama is hiding it, and what he has it ear-marked for.

Obama has no budget. Obama has no interest, or even sees a need, for presenting an alternate solution to the debt crisis. He just wants to get his way, and Republicans MUST be FIERCE in their determination not to cave-in to Obama AT ALL! NO DEALS! There is no need for it. Republicans just need to lay their solution on his desk, and leave it to him to accept or reject it. Congress controls the purse strings. I have heard this ever since I was a little boy. Obama does not have the authority to overrule Congress on this matter, so what Congress wants is what Obama is stuck with. And if Obama tries to overrule Congress in this matter, then Congress has to stop him.

8:01 am mdt

A final word of warning

We know the left has a lot of money and power. But we know to get their way, they will lie, and distort, and do everything they can to deceive the American. The advantage we have is that we stand for the right things. We have to get our strength from that, no matter what happens.

If Obama does not get his way, history has shown us how dictators can become unglued and will do everything they can to keep the control that they have. We will be in danger of Obama becoming that kind of dictator. He has shown this with his strong-armed tactics to get what he wants. A real monster may jump out of the box at us if he does not get his way because so much is riding on his succeeding with his getting his way on the debt crisis now.

But we will all be far better off in the long run if we stop this man now than deal with him later after he gets his way in all this. We must because it will be the best, and last, time to show Obama’s true colors to the American people. By robbing Obama and keeping him from getting his way this last time, we can then force the issue with him to find out where all the money is to repair this mess and expose all the corruption that he has bought with him to Washington. When we do that, Obama’s crimes against the state will be made known, and he WILL BE impeachable. Pelosi, Reid, Geithner, Obama’s czars and all Obama’s other cohorts can be kicked out of Washington, as well.

With that, we have the chance to continue to bring in fresh blood to Washington that will take the reins and change Washington truly for the better. It will not be easy. There will be much to be done, and much to be corrected. But if do this, the American spirit will come roaring back, and America WILL shine again, to show other countries how well our system works, and what we can do when people are truly free to follow their dreams.

I declare onto you that we simply MUST cut off the head of the snake now, or it will rise up and destroy us all later. It is a hard thing, but I tell you, IT HAS TO BE DONE, and America will become strong again if we do.

In Donald Trump’s words, there can be absolutely no EL FOLDO…

--

Wm. Scott Francis

8:00 am mdt

2011.07.01
2011.05.01
2011.03.01
2011.02.01
2011.01.01
2010.12.01
2010.11.01
2010.10.01
2010.09.01
2010.08.01
2010.07.01
2010.06.01
2010.05.01
2010.03.01
2009.12.01
2009.10.01
2009.09.01
2009.08.01

You are visitor no.

Archived Messages

*   *   *   *   *   *